DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ve, ee, ee mere eerie ENT REE AE poryano
LOAM POP. Gi ee er tr sme er ne see
701 S$. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NROS107-14
14 November 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of. the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13
November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel
Command (NPC} memo 1811 Pers-835/056 of 30 Sept 2014, a COpy of which
was provided to you on 14 October 2014, and is being provided to you
now. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory
opinion dated 7 Nov 2014,
However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied, The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
orrection of an officiai naval :
consequently, when applying for ac
ate the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstr
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely, y
A TA , “A
y
DY GG VES EF RE
aS ROBERT J. ONETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4124 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5126 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO5S126-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1724 14
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1724-14 11 September 2014 This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction of Naval Record (DD Form Da Gy « A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4400 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket MNo.NkKO44U0-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofiiciai naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3951 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7431 Ser N130C/14U1257 dated 25 September 2014, a COPY of which was sent to you on 10 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7631 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6453 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ble material error or injustice. year from the date of the Board's decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3764 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this cage. Docket No.NHRO3764-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an optical naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.